I'm gonna vote NP on this one

"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg) 03/27/2018 at 19:34 • Filed to: None

3

9

!!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!!

Nibby > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 03/27/2018 at 19:54

2

This Volvo encompasses true beauty which transcends beyond what the human eye can see and beyond what the human mind can fathom.

shop-teacher > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 03/27/2018 at 19:59

1

I would have to agree.

sony1492 > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 03/27/2018 at 20:12

1

They made a coupe!? Definately NP for the mileage and turbo, only downside is the auto.

boredalways > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 03/27/2018 at 20:12

1

I hate to say this in a public forum, but the temptation of an act of violence to acquire this vehicle has temporarily overcome me.

And if I read the CarFox correctly, it’s a 1-owner car to boot!

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Nibby 03/27/2018 at 20:29

1

It looks nice

Shour, Aloof and Obnoxious > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 03/27/2018 at 21:12

1

Holy moly, that’s gorgeous, pristine, and worth every penny. That’s worth a loan in my book.

For Sweden > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 03/27/2018 at 22:58

1

This is a very good car and a very Seattle car.

boxrocket > sony1492 03/27/2018 at 23:36

1

IIRC all the 780s came as automatics, since they were designed more as tourers.

That said, I had the same auto in my 1990 760 Turbo Wagon, and it did quite well and was very robust. It could have used an extra gear or three, mostly for highway cruising and mileage. Having to be in the high 2000-3000rpm range just to keep up with highway traffic suuuuucked.

Chan - Mid-engine with cabin fever > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 03/28/2018 at 00:06

1

Damn, this is NP all the way at anything under five digits.